【鄧國宏】戴震哲學方式論新探——以“解釋學循環一包養網站比較”為視角的觀察

The theory of “interpretation of the learning cycle” was used to observe the classical description of Dai Zhen and the Qing Confucians. Relevant researchers have expressed many opinions, but the understanding is not unified. It even formed a counterpoint. Achievements that can be achieved. Some researchers used “interpretation circles” to criticize Dai Zhen’s classical and philosophical innovation, pointing out that Dai Zhen’s classical descriptions and methods did not fit the “interpretation circles”. For example, Money Books, Li Mingxiu, Huang Junjie, etc., all believe that “it is clear by the training. The interpretation of theory is beyond the verbal interpretation of the vocabulary in the scrutiny, resulting in a serious lack of development and even errors in classical overall thinking; some researchers believe that “interpretation of learning circle” can be used to clarify the relevant arguments of Dai Zhen’s philosophical approach, and Dai Zhen’s philosophical approach and “interpretation of learning circle” existCultivation market There are many similarities, such as Li Gongran, who analyzed the Qing Dynasty’s guest-resolving methodsFemale College Students’ Care Club discusses the suspicion of the “circulation of scrutiny” principle, criticizes Li Mingxiu, Huang Junjie and others for applying “interpretation of scrutiny” to criticize the mistakes of Dai Zhen and other Qing Confucians, and also like Liu Qingping, Zhou Guangqing, Wu Genyou and others also used the theory of “domain integration” and the “big heart” of Dai Zhenzhe to solve the solution of “meeting with the heart” with the sage. After carefully evaluating these results, the researchers discussed their own understanding in the theory of “interpretation of the circle” and used the “interpretation of the circle 博官网” to explain the applicable, factual recognition and qualitative issues of Dai Zhen’s classical commentary method. In other words, although many students have expressed their opinions on this, they have not divided the multiple meanings of “interpretation circles”, and have not understood them well, or have not thoroughly evaluated Dai Zhen’s philosophical method, and there are still many ambiguous and biased aspects of his understanding. There are also some uncorrelated points in the discussions, which leave the writer with a further step-by-step exploration space. In this regard, this article begins by analyzing the multiple meanings of “interpreting the cyclic circle”, and then uses this to compare Dai Zhen’s philosophical way of discussion, and based on this, we try to propose some understanding of its characteristics and lack.

Finally, as the learner said: “In the ‘philosophical’ scrutiny’, the ‘circular circle of discussion’ is no longer a principle of discussion in a way., but a basic principle of the intrinsic theory, which will not be blocked by imperfect or biased approaches”③, that is, whether the interpreter can have a clear understanding of the “interpretation cycle” in terms of whether the interpreter can have a clear understanding of the “interpretation cycle”, the actual activities of the classical essay inevitably have a “interpretation cycle”. In fact, in classical essay activities, the argument of the method of the commentator’s own perception can often be compared with classical essays. The actual activities of the actual activities are not completely different. Therefore, in order to prevent the above two levels of content and the reconciliation of the article’s statement, the author will not deal with the specific problems in the classical commentary of Dai Zhen, but will only evaluate the self-consciousness and arguments in a clear way. This is a pre-explanation explanation of the assessment method in this article.

2. The multiple connotations of “interpretation of the learning cycle” As a main feature of human interpretation activities, “circulation” has long been recognized and explored. Based on the current study of Oriental Explanation by domestic students, this phenomenon is called “interpretation cycle”, in the Oriental Explanation from “partner interpretation” to “philosophical interpretation” (“general interpretation”) In the entire development process, it is one of the focus issues that are being assessed. According to the narrative integration taught by He Huiping, “the basic meaning is that the mastery of the meaning of the whole must be based on the understanding of the department, and the understanding of the meaning of the department must be based on the mastery of the whole” ④. It can be seen that the so-called “interpretation cycle” refers to the mutual dependence between the door and the whole in the human interpretation activity inclusive app, the cycle of contracting each other.